The Constitutional Court, by analyzing the provisions on housing privatization legislation, came to the conclusion that the restriction of the rights and freedoms of citizens by defining the range of objects not subject to privatization, is admissible only if the circumstances prejudge the peculiarities of the legal regime of the dwelling, primarily its purpose, exclude the possibility of transmission of the space in a private property. From the above legal position, it follows that the ban on the privatization of certain objects of state or municipal housing stock can only be due to the peculiarities of the legal regime of objects. Spaces obtained by citizens under contracts of social hiring, both before and after March 1, 2005 were provided by the state or municipal housing stock, ie in the period of the general validity of the rules of free privatization of residential premises of state and municipal housing funds.
Agricultural Taxation And Economic Development
Find and Download book
- Try another server.
- Try to reload page — press F5 on keyboard.
- Clear browser cache.
- Clear browser cookies.
- Try other browser.
- If you still getting an error — please contact us and we will fix this error ASAP.