The first stage of our work comes down to nothing. It took to make known the comparison between clinical and anatomical data in the field of hereditary diseases and between their genetic characteristics. This proved to be very fruitful. I had to make a great review of the factual material and our nozograficheskie identify those or other diseases had to be revised, and largely even alter our nozografii. Some of the controversial issues that have long occupied the doctors had to resolve on the basis of genealogical data. Let me give you a small example of his region, which will illustrate this. There is a dominant form of hereditary muscular atrophy, which is called Charcot and Marie amyotrophy. Described another disease was very similar to it, in which, moreover, greatly thickened peripheral nerves, known as hypertrophic neuritis. There were a lot of dispute about that, whether it's two different diseases, or are random variations of the same disease. These arguments were already several decades and they attended the classical master of neuropathology. When the genetic inspection, however, it turned out that these hypertrophic neuritis at least two: there is a recessive neuritis and dominant optic neuritis, and that the dominant hypertrophic neuritis is a variation (phenotypic) amyotrophy of Charcot and Marie recessive same form is independent and has its own clinical characteristics . In some respects, had thus split forms schitavshiesyakompaktnymi into individual form. In other cases, on the basis of genetic analysis had to drain the forms described as separate, combine them into a joint disease.
Victor Griffuelhes and French Syndicalism, 1895-1922
Find and Download book
- Try another server.
- Try to reload page — press F5 on keyboard.
- Clear browser cache.
- Clear browser cookies.
- Try other browser.
- If you still getting an error — please contact us and we will fix this error ASAP.